- #Best virtual machine software for windows 10 upgrade#
- #Best virtual machine software for windows 10 windows 8#
#Best virtual machine software for windows 10 windows 8#
Hyper-V, however, has a bit of a "gotcha" - it's unique to Windows (Windows Server 2008 or newer OR Windows 8 or newer). If you want more modern virtualization, which, with the right CPU or OS, is skinnier than either VMware or VirtualBox, then you want Hyper-V. To give you an idea how long ago THAT was, LGA1155 - Sandy Bridge - was not even three months old.)
#Best virtual machine software for windows 10 upgrade#
The Q6600 upgrade was planned to go to Mom - not me however, that was right around the beginning of the Great Recession - which has kept my upgrade plans stalled ever since. Unlike the Conroe-based Celeron DC E1xxx, these Celerons *kept* VT-x hardware-virtualization support. Oracle VirtualBox will also work with a Celeron DC E3xxx (which also has VT-x) - this particular Celeron is a cut-down Wolfdale Core 2 Duo. You will be fine with any i series processor if I am fine with a Core 2 Duo :yes: My host OS is 8.1 圆4 and I have VMs for XP, Windows Server (many versions), 7 and 8.1 as well as several Linux distros from Arch to Ubuntu.
My current computer is a 2.53Ghz Core 2 Duo with 4GB RAM (Dell Studio 17 laptop for those interested) from 2008 and I use VMs on it all the time with VMware Workstation. I use Hyper-V myself but I'd recommend Virtualbox for ease of use and features. In general, the only way you'll be able to lower performance overheads for virtualization is to use a Type-1 hypervisor (like Hyper-V for example) (Wikipedia discusses the types), but in practice these are going to be less convenient to use because they lack some of integration you see in Type-2 hypervisors (ex. Here's some simple results showing performance between vmware and vbox: you'll note that there isn't much of a different on anything but I/O. I don't know of anyone who really does this though. Personally, I've noticed that I get the best performance if I drop the VM on a raw drive and skip the container altogether. I'd say the largest performance difference (and bottleneck) tends to be container access times (last I heard, vhdx containers were the best in that regard).
Lightest in terms of what? Resource and performance wise there isn't going to be much of a difference between any of the regular contenders.
0 kommentar(er)
